Nicola and I attended the conference, you can see lots of the sessions and participate in discussions online. One I found particularly useful on teacher training. They talk about how they focus on key skills in the early stages of a CerTESOL course which they identify as listening to learners and correcting them and creating lsson content from "within" ythrough anecdotes for example DOGME style. Here is the link:
http://iatefl.britishcouncil.org/2010/sessions/2010-04-08/teacher-training-unplugged-simplifying-initial-language-teacher-education-anthon
Here are brief notes on three other sessions I found particularly interesting. E mail me if you would like to know more or meet to discuss any of them :
Adrian Underhill on Coaching
a simple tool called GROW which helps you to help your colleagues focus on their goals. I am using it for appraisals with management staff here at OH at the moment
Ema Ushioda on Motivation and Autonomy
I am very interested in how we can move the focus from teaching to learning to help students move forward more quickly with their English. Ema had interesting things to say about the importance of students having choice and the influence of the peer group in motivation. I have started a blog with a colleague from Cadiz, Dan Barber which you can visit if you would like to learn and contribute on this topic
http://ourenglishlearning.blogspot.com/
Michael Berman on NLP and telling stories
This session reminded me how powerful stories are as a way of transmitting and remembering ideas. We did a guided visualisation which I liked too.
Monday, 19 April 2010
Tuesday, 23 March 2010
FCE
Top Tips for the FCE
by Rosie Burke
Rosie Burke is a teacher/teacher trainer with International House – BCN. She is an experienced exam preparation teacher specialising in teaching YL and teenagers.
The following is a summary of the workshop she gave at International House – BCN on Saturday, 6th February, 2010 from 4.45 – 5.45 pm as part of an ELT Conference.
Summary
Through several fun and engaging teacher activities Rosie managed to get her message(s) across:
* teachers should be well- familiar with the FCE exam format
* when giving instructions clear focus on the task should be kept – students can easily get distracted and overwhelmed by information
* teachers should build up a good rapport soon after course starts so that students can fully trust their methods
* students should be encouraged to keep an error record, or as Rosie calls it ‘favourite mistakes’ record
* TQA technique (timing, analyse questions, analyse answers)
* do regular mock exams & make sure you focus enough on timing, transferring answers, but non-language aspects as well, like dealing with stress, making sure you’ve got the ID, stationary, etc. remind students not to cheat
* When transferring answers, numbers should be written in numerals, not words, e.g. ‘5 hours’ not ‘five hours’ (Listening paper)
Some ideas for student activities:
* quizzes (exam format)
* matching tasks
* jumbled exam paper
* writing exam tasks
* exploring the topic area
* predicting / brainstorming possible answers
* talking about the exam to people not directly involved in the process, like family and friends
We (the participants) tied out to some extent some of these activities. It was an eye opening experience as far as some aspects of exam practice teachers normally don’t experience are concerned, for e.g. receiving a lot of information in a short amount of time, having to multitask and monitor your decisions, confronting stress and frustration. However, I found predicting answers to be overvalued and little or no attention was paid to how it affects individual students, whether it is more effective or less overall and how much time should be assigned to this practice having in mind the course length and syllabus constraints.
Overall, I found attending this workshop a valuable and rewarding experience which allowed us to step back from our daily routine and reflect on the whole process from both teacher and student perspective.
by Rosie Burke
Rosie Burke is a teacher/teacher trainer with International House – BCN. She is an experienced exam preparation teacher specialising in teaching YL and teenagers.
The following is a summary of the workshop she gave at International House – BCN on Saturday, 6th February, 2010 from 4.45 – 5.45 pm as part of an ELT Conference.
Summary
Through several fun and engaging teacher activities Rosie managed to get her message(s) across:
* teachers should be well- familiar with the FCE exam format
* when giving instructions clear focus on the task should be kept – students can easily get distracted and overwhelmed by information
* teachers should build up a good rapport soon after course starts so that students can fully trust their methods
* students should be encouraged to keep an error record, or as Rosie calls it ‘favourite mistakes’ record
* TQA technique (timing, analyse questions, analyse answers)
* do regular mock exams & make sure you focus enough on timing, transferring answers, but non-language aspects as well, like dealing with stress, making sure you’ve got the ID, stationary, etc. remind students not to cheat
* When transferring answers, numbers should be written in numerals, not words, e.g. ‘5 hours’ not ‘five hours’ (Listening paper)
Some ideas for student activities:
* quizzes (exam format)
* matching tasks
* jumbled exam paper
* writing exam tasks
* exploring the topic area
* predicting / brainstorming possible answers
* talking about the exam to people not directly involved in the process, like family and friends
We (the participants) tied out to some extent some of these activities. It was an eye opening experience as far as some aspects of exam practice teachers normally don’t experience are concerned, for e.g. receiving a lot of information in a short amount of time, having to multitask and monitor your decisions, confronting stress and frustration. However, I found predicting answers to be overvalued and little or no attention was paid to how it affects individual students, whether it is more effective or less overall and how much time should be assigned to this practice having in mind the course length and syllabus constraints.
Overall, I found attending this workshop a valuable and rewarding experience which allowed us to step back from our daily routine and reflect on the whole process from both teacher and student perspective.
Monday, 22 February 2010
Multiple Voices from the classroom: becoming a better Teacher
A summary of the Luke Prodromou presentation
by Michelle Dowding
Prodromou has conducted research on language teaching expertise; his ultimate goal being to determine what exactly is a ‘good teacher’ and what qualities good teachers possess. It is suggested that a logical place to start is to think of one’s own educational experiences and to remember your favorite teacher. Just think about this for a minute. What kind of person was this teacher? What qualities did he/she possess? Don’t stop there. Anyone that has been a source of inspiration in your life can be a good resource for the classroom, whether it’s Shakespeare, Mozart, your favorite author, actor, friend or family member. The key is to identify what exactly makes these people inspirational and how this can be transmitted to the students.
Prodromou proceeds to investigate by conducting an on-line survey which includes data from various teachers throughout Europe. Teachers were asked to define what they believed to be a good teacher. This resulted in interesting theories, as teachers themselves opened up to share their opinions, theories and experiences. It was stated that a good teacher should be supportive, especially when students have to take a difficult exam. A good teacher is strict up to a point and at the same time so patient. A good teacher is calm, open, and sympathetic and can discuss anything. It is the job of the teacher to get the students to open up and speak. This may not be an easy task but if you can find out what the ‘shy’ student is passionate about the transformation can be amazing. The data indicated that a good teacher was: kind, patient, friendly, interesting, enthusiastic, able to explain well, have a good sense of humor and talked about other things outside the classroom.
Subsequently the next step was to find out what exactly a good teacher does. Data showed that good teachers: explain things simply at a reasonable rate, going step by step, using examples, pausing to ask students if they have questions and allow students to contribute their personal knowledge. Good teachers don’t move on but patiently go over repeat things that are not understood.
So does this mean that becoming good teacher is a simple formula of good qualities plus criteria of good things to do? Not necessarily, Prodromou suggests other qualities which “expert teachers’ posses often come from experience. These so called experts possess knowledge derived from the classroom, such as learning about typical student behaviors, using this knowledge to make predictions about what might happen and knowing a lot about their students before they even meet them. An expert teacher knows how to manage the class with routines and other techniques which have be learned, this allows freedom to focus on the class content rather than management issues. Interactive decision making is also important.
Prodromou’s final point was RAP, which stands for rapport, attitude and presence. These are qualities which he considers to be invaluable in a teacher. The absence of RAP cannot be replaced with educational knowledge and appropriate conduct. So walk into your classroom and think RAP and you might just inspire your students as you were once inspired by your favorite teacher.
by Michelle Dowding
Prodromou has conducted research on language teaching expertise; his ultimate goal being to determine what exactly is a ‘good teacher’ and what qualities good teachers possess. It is suggested that a logical place to start is to think of one’s own educational experiences and to remember your favorite teacher. Just think about this for a minute. What kind of person was this teacher? What qualities did he/she possess? Don’t stop there. Anyone that has been a source of inspiration in your life can be a good resource for the classroom, whether it’s Shakespeare, Mozart, your favorite author, actor, friend or family member. The key is to identify what exactly makes these people inspirational and how this can be transmitted to the students.
Prodromou proceeds to investigate by conducting an on-line survey which includes data from various teachers throughout Europe. Teachers were asked to define what they believed to be a good teacher. This resulted in interesting theories, as teachers themselves opened up to share their opinions, theories and experiences. It was stated that a good teacher should be supportive, especially when students have to take a difficult exam. A good teacher is strict up to a point and at the same time so patient. A good teacher is calm, open, and sympathetic and can discuss anything. It is the job of the teacher to get the students to open up and speak. This may not be an easy task but if you can find out what the ‘shy’ student is passionate about the transformation can be amazing. The data indicated that a good teacher was: kind, patient, friendly, interesting, enthusiastic, able to explain well, have a good sense of humor and talked about other things outside the classroom.
Subsequently the next step was to find out what exactly a good teacher does. Data showed that good teachers: explain things simply at a reasonable rate, going step by step, using examples, pausing to ask students if they have questions and allow students to contribute their personal knowledge. Good teachers don’t move on but patiently go over repeat things that are not understood.
So does this mean that becoming good teacher is a simple formula of good qualities plus criteria of good things to do? Not necessarily, Prodromou suggests other qualities which “expert teachers’ posses often come from experience. These so called experts possess knowledge derived from the classroom, such as learning about typical student behaviors, using this knowledge to make predictions about what might happen and knowing a lot about their students before they even meet them. An expert teacher knows how to manage the class with routines and other techniques which have be learned, this allows freedom to focus on the class content rather than management issues. Interactive decision making is also important.
Prodromou’s final point was RAP, which stands for rapport, attitude and presence. These are qualities which he considers to be invaluable in a teacher. The absence of RAP cannot be replaced with educational knowledge and appropriate conduct. So walk into your classroom and think RAP and you might just inspire your students as you were once inspired by your favorite teacher.
Thursday, 18 February 2010
MOTIVATING and CHALLENGING ADVANCED BUSINESS ENGLISH LEARNERS
by Rachel Appleby
Although the title of this workshop seemed to indicate that the speaker would be addressing techniques to motivate advanced students, in reality she spoke to the audience about a series of activities which may be engaging for learners. Here are two of the most interesting that came up:
1. Sentence starters
e.g. If I wasn’t a teacher, [I’d be a... because....]
Not many people know that I’m particularly interested in...
By this time next year, [I’ll have...]
If I didn’t have to work to earn money, [I’d...]
One of my most memorable experiences is...
Put these on the board (decide if you want to elicit/give the continuing structure in [] brackets), and give students slips of paper, asking them to choose and complete three of them. Then get them to share and discuss their full sentences in small groups. Elicit feedback on the more interesting ideas.
2. Skills: freer-speaking activity. Breaking down a topic.
To give us an example of ‘breaking down a topic’, the speaker took the example of the topic of ‘sport’. She explained that ‘sport’ may not be particularly interesting to some students but by ‘breaking down’ the subject, it may be presented from different angles.
For example, for ‘sport and leisure’, the following questions may be written on pieces of paper for students to discuss in small groups:
a.Is a global event like the Olympic Games more about politics and money than sport itself?
b.Are hobbies only for people who have too much leisure time?
c. Is formula 1 motor racing really a sport?
d. Who is your country’s most famous sportsperson? How are they a reflection of national identity?
e.Which sports are most popular in your country?
Although the title of this workshop seemed to indicate that the speaker would be addressing techniques to motivate advanced students, in reality she spoke to the audience about a series of activities which may be engaging for learners. Here are two of the most interesting that came up:
1. Sentence starters
e.g. If I wasn’t a teacher, [I’d be a... because....]
Not many people know that I’m particularly interested in...
By this time next year, [I’ll have...]
If I didn’t have to work to earn money, [I’d...]
One of my most memorable experiences is...
Put these on the board (decide if you want to elicit/give the continuing structure in [] brackets), and give students slips of paper, asking them to choose and complete three of them. Then get them to share and discuss their full sentences in small groups. Elicit feedback on the more interesting ideas.
2. Skills: freer-speaking activity. Breaking down a topic.
To give us an example of ‘breaking down a topic’, the speaker took the example of the topic of ‘sport’. She explained that ‘sport’ may not be particularly interesting to some students but by ‘breaking down’ the subject, it may be presented from different angles.
For example, for ‘sport and leisure’, the following questions may be written on pieces of paper for students to discuss in small groups:
a.Is a global event like the Olympic Games more about politics and money than sport itself?
b.Are hobbies only for people who have too much leisure time?
c. Is formula 1 motor racing really a sport?
d. Who is your country’s most famous sportsperson? How are they a reflection of national identity?
e.Which sports are most popular in your country?
Pronunciation - 10 Rules I Want My Students To Know
This workshop was presented by Brian Brennan, a senior teacher at International House, and attempted not only to demonstrate the importance of pronunciation in students’ language learning but also to provide teachers with some tools with which to help them.
As is the fashion at the moment the workshop was based around a numerical theme, this time 10 rules...
The following lists the 6 most practical points.
Brian’s Rules ( better perhaps, ‘language points’, as there are no actual rules).
1) What does stressing a syllable really mean?
Stressing a syllable can actually mean a number of different things but students should be made aware of the following aspects.
1) The voice rises towards the stressed syllable
2) The stressed syllable is pronounced for longer
3) The volume of the voice goes up
4) There is a change in the pitch of the voice after the syllable.
Brian suggested that work raising awareness of these points and practicing in class can significantly improve the student’s intelligibility, as imperfect word stress often leads to incomprehension in the listener even if the word elected by the student is the correct one.
2) People out there will often misunderstand unexpected pronunciation.
Following on from the last point, this statement in fact works both ways. ‘People out there’ will indeed misunderstand, but as importantly, students will misunderstand other English speakers who are pronouncing correctly.
3) The past simple regular verb -ed ending has 3 possible sounds.
Which is the one that is really different? When does it occur? Probably the least integrated language point for students. This part of the lecture focused on the /ɪd/ ending and suggested the students recognise the extra syllable and from that use the /ɪd/ sound. There was no mention of the more fundamental aspect of students’ understanding of voiced and unvoiced consonant sounds.
4) Consonant + vowel + consonant + ‘e’.
This was a useful reminder that when we add an -e to a single syllable word the vowel sound in the word lengthens. For example; hat / hate, pal / pale. A good exercise is to get students to write a number of these short words and to experiment with the changes in vowel sound.
5) Doubling the final consonant.
Similar to above, but in this case the doubling of an end consonant shortens the preceding vowel.
6) A group of words often sounds like just one chunk.
In the same way that students can learn common phrases and sentences (lexical chunking) so to for pronunciation. Words are rarely used in isolation and so it can be extremely beneficial for students to hear how groups of words sound together, which is often quite different to what students might expect if they’d only studied the written form.
As is the fashion at the moment the workshop was based around a numerical theme, this time 10 rules...
The following lists the 6 most practical points.
Brian’s Rules ( better perhaps, ‘language points’, as there are no actual rules).
1) What does stressing a syllable really mean?
Stressing a syllable can actually mean a number of different things but students should be made aware of the following aspects.
1) The voice rises towards the stressed syllable
2) The stressed syllable is pronounced for longer
3) The volume of the voice goes up
4) There is a change in the pitch of the voice after the syllable.
Brian suggested that work raising awareness of these points and practicing in class can significantly improve the student’s intelligibility, as imperfect word stress often leads to incomprehension in the listener even if the word elected by the student is the correct one.
2) People out there will often misunderstand unexpected pronunciation.
Following on from the last point, this statement in fact works both ways. ‘People out there’ will indeed misunderstand, but as importantly, students will misunderstand other English speakers who are pronouncing correctly.
3) The past simple regular verb -ed ending has 3 possible sounds.
Which is the one that is really different? When does it occur? Probably the least integrated language point for students. This part of the lecture focused on the /ɪd/ ending and suggested the students recognise the extra syllable and from that use the /ɪd/ sound. There was no mention of the more fundamental aspect of students’ understanding of voiced and unvoiced consonant sounds.
4) Consonant + vowel + consonant + ‘e’.
This was a useful reminder that when we add an -e to a single syllable word the vowel sound in the word lengthens. For example; hat / hate, pal / pale. A good exercise is to get students to write a number of these short words and to experiment with the changes in vowel sound.
5) Doubling the final consonant.
Similar to above, but in this case the doubling of an end consonant shortens the preceding vowel.
6) A group of words often sounds like just one chunk.
In the same way that students can learn common phrases and sentences (lexical chunking) so to for pronunciation. Words are rarely used in isolation and so it can be extremely beneficial for students to hear how groups of words sound together, which is often quite different to what students might expect if they’d only studied the written form.
Make pronunciation physical, visible, audible! A multi-experience approach
1. A physical side of teaching pronunciation has developed that includes putting students in touch with their muscles so that pronunciation is not just a mental activity, but a visible and physical one that students can feel.
2. The sounds have been organized into a phonemic chart (based on symbols used by dictionaries) that includes a geographic design to show how to get the sound.
3. Pronunciation has been demystified so that it is no longer part of a ´black box´ that both teachers and students are afraid to enter.
Following these breakthroughs, Adrian also proposed three breakaway ideas for the future of pronunciation teaching:
1. Mistakes to be seen as a gift where they provide the journey for teaching.
2. Work with the whole system all at once. As opposed to isolating a single sounds or focusing on minimal pairs during one lesson, Adrian argued that students need to learn the sounds all at once, as all vowels affect each other. He highlighted three levels of student progress when using the entire phonemic chart:
a. sounds in isolation
b. bonding the sounds together to make words
c. words together to make connected speech (including such things as rhythm, intonation, etc.)
3. A reduction in repetition without purpose in pronunciation teaching (no more time consuming habit formation)
By using gestures and facial expressions, teachers can begin to get their learners to make the sounds on the chart. This also includes placement of the tongue and jaw to change the different sounds produced. Students can then feel and see their muscles working.
Adrian suggested not only using the chart with entire class, but also with individual students in front of the class. He says students need to get up to the board and get over their fears or embarrassment, and once they do, the real learning can begin. There are four different ways he mentioned to work with individual learners using the chart and a pointer:
1. Teacher has pointer and points to a sound. Student says sound.
2. Teacher has pointer and Student says sound. Teacher points to sound.
3. Student has pointer and points to a sound. Teacher says sound.
4. Student has pointer and Teacher says sound. Student points to sound .
While the teacher is working with this individual learner, the other learners in the class will be engaged with what is happening, and can also make contributions to keep their attention as well.
Adrian also mentioned the interactive phonemic chart on onestopenglish.com as a useful resource that I have included the link for here.
I found the session to be informative, interactive and completely worthwhile. If you ever get the chance to attend a seminar given by Adrian Underhill, I would highly recommend you go to it!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)